Blogging can be an unforgiving 'business', especially for those specialising in satire. Jack Marx, one of the Sydney Morning Herald's best bloggers got burnt back in May when his family and home was threatened by an aggrieved reader. The lesson learned was to never give your phone number out to readers. Doh !
The contentious post attracted healthy comment feedback and was eventually closed, though didn't warrant being removed. However on Monday, Marx posted a tongue-in-cheek suggestion that Israeli Jews be offered safe sanctuary in Tasmania. This not only drew around 200 animated responses but, for the first time, led to the comments being removed altogether. Marx's explanation,
Indeed, some of the comments were fractious, abusive, arguably offensive and not at all in the spirit of the original post. But it was something other than "embarrassment" that saw the comments go, for a newspaper cannot and should not ever be embarrassed by the behaviour of some of its readers - Jack.
In yesterday's SMH Gerard Henderson argued the Israel lobby has no influence in Aussie politics. One wonders if the same can be said for the Aussie media ? Otherwise, why were said comments removed, when back in May comments which lead to personal threats against Marx were deemed not dangerous enough to warrant being removed ?
Just curious, that's all. Besides the other question of can the MSM operate blogs without tight censorship robbing them(blogs) of their defining raison détre - citizen journalism.
Recent Comments