My recent post Too Wasted has attracted a large volume of traffic and some reasonable comment. Namely, how does one deal with wasted passengers ? Whilst a NSW cabbie is not legally obliged to carry such people, the question of responsibility is nonetheless valid. Does it turn on the patron, the hotel or the cabbie ? Here's a cabbie's rationale...
Consider this current case in Canada where a driver left a wasted passenger on the steps of a house. She subsequently froze to death in a temperature of -9°C,
The claim states Kahnapace was a patron at the Regina bar on Nov. 18, 2000. After consuming a large amount of alcohol, bar staff helped her call a taxi.
Johnson picked up Kahnapace from the bar. She told him she had money and directed him to take her to an address. When they arrived, Kahnapace wasn't able to pay the $4.05 fare.
Johnson had earlier stook trial for criminal negligence in the case in 2002, when the court heard there were two jackets in the cab _ one described as a cotton windbreaker, the other a heavier coat. Johnson gave Kahnapace the lighter coat, handed her a receipt for the heavier coat, then walked her to the steps of the house.
Although the cabbie was acquitted of criminal negligence, the deceased’s family is now suing the driver for multiple damages. So they should too, after he left the woman without adequate protection against the cold, for the sake of a $6 fare. But it’s a fair bet he’s now ruing the decision to accept that fare, once he saw how wasted she was.
In the case of the stranded woman in Too Wasted, I instinctively chose the letter of the law, rather than basic compassion. Something wasn’t right. Yet regular Cablog readers would be aware I’ve often applied the benefit of the doubt to passengers needing help, as will most cabbies. I know I speak for most cabbies in that we do care for others, as much as humanly possible. We have families too.
Conversely though, taxi driving is a dangerous and thankless job, especially when it comes to dealing with drunks and drug addicts. On a nightly basis we see a side of life not fully appreciated or witnessed by most others and, understandably we can become cynical and desensitised to the predicament of the wasted.
For basic reasons of self-preservation and financial viability we’re required to make snap judgements as to who we allow into our workplaces. Make the wrong call and we could be dead, robbed, bashed, charged, sued, whatever.
So when given a choice to carry a wasted passenger, a driver’s intuition must be fully satisfied, otherwise he can be forgiven for driving off at the slightest doubt. I have no intention of pleading the merits of charity from a courtroom dock or hospital bed. During a long night shift, the major goal is to safely make it home to my own bed. Good night.
Recent Comments